• 150 Things to Love About Madison (13)
• Apologies (3)
• Existential Nonsense (391)
• Fun Shit I've Done (66)
  • Hanging Out With My Friends (63)
  • Spring Break (21)
• Funny Shit (118)
  • Horribly Inappropriate Things I've Said (14)
  • Potentially Entirely Unhelpful Analogies (19)
• General Awesomeness (70)
• General Remarks (21)
• Grammar for Idiots (1)
• Law School (80)
  • Wisconsin Law Review (35)
• Life Sucks Sometimes (85)
  • Goddamnit (12)
• Quiz Things (18)
  • Polls (13)
• Rants (68)
  • Legal Rants (28)
  • Philosophical Rants (53)
  • Political Rants (45)
  • Rants About Things That Make Me Irrationally Angry (82)
  • Rants on the News (79)
• Reviews (46)
  • Book Reviews (8)
  • Movie Reviews (40)
  • Music Reviews (61)
  • Restaurant and Bar Reviews (12)
  • Television Reviews (40)
• The Law Firm (10)
• The Lovers of Sight and Sound (5)
• Things I Wish I Could Take Back (1)
• Things I'm Irrationally Attached To (67)
  • Harry Potter (17)
  • Heroes (31)
  • Star Wars (8)
  • Superman (15)
  • The Lord of the Rings (11)
  • The Smashing Pumpkins (33)

Pay Day Loans and No Fax Payday Loans are available for people nationwide. All applications are accepted with quick pay day loan approvals.

news yankees

i am far from an expert in French politics and am speaking from what I have seen and experienced in my two years living here. You are speaking of Lepen in 2002? He was beaten by Chirac who took 80% of the vote. And as I wasn't here in 2002 I don't know how the media reacted then. But what I meant in my post was I truly appreciated the way the elections and the candidates were presented in the news. I remember seeing reports on each candidate and what their plans for the country were. Plus every candidate no matter how popular or ahead they are in the polls, is garanteed equal coverage by the media. They calculate the time spent on each, so even the unknown underdogs get a chance.
I don't think the French voters are smarter or more enlightened but like I said before, they were not bombared with the bullshit that Americans get everyday. And I seriously doubt what a candidate's pastor said, or whether he wears a pin or not, would get a fraction of the attention here as it does in the US. This is part of the reason the world just gwaks at us. Our politics are closely followed around the world and from the outside it seems like a three ring circus.
And Obama could not renounce Wright as a person. He has seen his good side. Relationships are sticky complicated issues and I think one of the positive qualities of Obama is that he does not have the Bush way of looking at things: Either you're with us or you're against us, We don't negotiate, period. Obama can weigh a whole issue just not a snippet.
Obama has said that disagreeing with someone is not a reason to stop talking. There is no black and white and I think to handle diplomatic and international relations one has to see that and Obama does.

estefanita:

I can't claim to know a lot about French politics or elections, but didn't a nationalist, holocaust-denier recently garner a huge number of votes in the French presidential election only to ultimately lose in the final round of voting? Man, the French sure are enlightened!

No one is arguing that Obama should abandon his religion. People think he should abandon his pastor. When this whole "controversy" erupted, and Obama was first asked about it in a debate, he specifically did not renounce Wright, the person. He only renounced some of his rhetoric, which I think is an important distinction.

And of course you shouldn't stop going to church or renounce your religion. But you should, perhaps, stop and think about what your religious leaders stand for and demand a high standard of conduct. Further, if your priest was found guilty of child molestation, I think you absolutely should stop supporting a church that employs him and should refrain from attending any events or services administered by him.

it really is embarassing having to try to explain things here in France. I was very impressed by the French elections last year, in the fact that even though the news was not completely unbiased the voters did not fall for the bullshit that americans can't seem to avoid. I have a newfound respect for the everyday French citizen that is more aware of real issues than the slime that the media reports.
I wonder, me being a catholic, should I stop going to church and renounce my religon because priests of the catholic church molested innocent children? I think no one would expect that of me, because apart from the scandal, i go to church out of personal faith in that religion. So Obama should be expected to turn his back on his religion based on the comments of one person? Religion is a community not totalitarian.
Plus, when you listen to the full sermon (the damn america one) you can see where the pastor was coming from. He was talking about not having faith in gov't because they can do things that are unjust (the indians, slavery, civil rights, etc) They were strong maybe shocking comments but please, what about the trash bill o'reiley spews everyday on cable tv. Wright did it in church and the reason people make a big deal about it is because they have nothing else to critique barack on. There is an excellent interveiw with Wright on PBS.com and I think he does an excellent job of proving he's no more nuts than the rest. I'll look for the link.....

wellbutrin cymbalta

It looks like lots of people here share my disdain for the whole Wright/Obama scandal and the double standard at work against him by some conservative talking heads and assorted wacko nut jobs.

I have a friend who posts all this 'Fuck Obama' shit on his Myspace that always pops up on my newsfeed. I finally answered one of his rants (a video compilation of Reverend Wright's statements) and decided to comment. I brought up the whole Pat Robertson/[insert pre-2005 Republican candidate here] similarity. After that he took the video down. I gotta believe it was because he saw the truth in my and others' statements, and not just because he wanted to censor opposing viewpoints.

cheers, kristen

I am not especially shocked that this is such a big issue on the cable news circuit or that regular people are getting their panties in a bunch over it. When I first saw the clips of Reverend Wright, my first thought was "Wow, that guy is a fucking loony bird," and my second thought was, "Wow, everyone is going to make an unreasonably huge deal out of this."

I moved on from it because I, like Vice, compared these statements to everything I know about Obama and decided they more than likely did not reflect his beliefs. However, I can understand why cable news did not move on - they make bigger piles of money by yelling like jackasses than by engaging in reasoned debate. I can also understand why lots of regular people won't let it go - they get most of their political information from the blowhard jackasses on cable news.

What I do not understand is why it isn't a bigger deal that McCain has aligned himself with people like Pat Robertson. Saying that "McCain allies himself with an overly religiously conservative pastor; Obama allies himself with a pastor who claims that America sucks and that white people are the devil" is putting quite a spin on reality. Pat Robertson is just as big a nutjob (if not bigger) than Reverend Wright.

Robertson has said that feminism encourages women to "kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians," that gay people want to thow blood on everyone and give them AIDS, that Hindus, Muslims and atheists shouldn't be allowed to hold government office, that Arabs are solely responsible for American slavery, that white people deserve more votes than minorities, that abortion and the secularization of America caused 9/11 as an example of God's wrath, and that "liberal American government" is to "evangelical Christians" as "Hitler and the Nazis" are to "the Jews."

The biggest reason I think the Obama-Wright thing is ridiculous is that it is on the news and the things I listed above are not. If this was really about the way the statements of people we ally ourselves with reflect our own values and potential policies, people would be on John McCain like herpes on Paris Hilton. But it isn't - it's about people tearing down a candidate they don't like using every means necessary, whether it is ethical or rational or not.

Ismael, this has been a recurrent issue for the Obamas. Michelle said she'd never been proud of this country until Barack became a real contender. Barack called working class voters bitter, and blamed that attitude for their guns, their God, and their xenophobia. Etc.

Like I said before, sensible people can accept that the Obamas did not mean to be insulting, and that the media (especially blogs) make more of those statements than necessary. But recall Kinsley's famous quote: "A gaffe is when a politician tells the truth." When a theme keeps reemerging, it's harder and harder to dismiss it as just poor phrasing.

May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006